OK. Maybe it is a server problem. I'll check with them again on Monday. I'll also try a few other pages on the server and see what happens. Do you know if you have to have the "s" in front of the extension name for a secure web page -- or is that an outmoded convention? Milton On Dec 18, 2005, at 12:28 AM, Nick Scalise wrote: > On Dec 17, 2005, at 11:21 PM, Milton van der Veen wrote: > >> Thanks, Nick. Isn't it always the way when you finally ask a >> question that's been bugging you? I just noticed something about >> the pages ... I wonder if it's the extensions that are giving me >> the problems. >> >> I redid the page as "dot html" instead of "dot shtml" and it seems >> to work better. I've had them as "dot shtml" since I set it up a >> couple of years ago and I haven't had many complaints till the >> past month or so. (Maybe more people are using Firefox now.) >> >> There is really no reason to use the "dot shtml" extension is >> there? I had always thought that the "s" in front of the file >> extensions in a secure site was needed. Am I wrong? >> >> ... and I noticed that you used the "dot html" extension when you >> uploaded the file too. > > Yeah, but your server should still serve it fine. I just renamed my > file back to .shtml and it works fine there too. > > Glad you got it working ok. > > -- > Nick Scalise > nickscalise at cox.net > > > _______________________________________________ > X4U mailing list > X4U at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x4u > > Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random > stuff: > http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984