On Jun 7, 2005, at 9:52 AM, Stroller wrote: >> I would suspect that when Macs go Intel, that the emulation hit >> would be nil because there would be no Intel--> PPC translation >> occurring. >> > > dZ indicates why some emulation overhead would still be incurred, > but my reasoning was mostly that Windows on Mac would likely still > be clumsy & unreliable. I don't use VPC myself, but I've seen > postings here about it crashing, or its disk image becoming > corrupted (losing all the data stored in it, IIRC). > I do use it myself and haven't had any problems with it... then again I don't use it often and mostly just to use IE to check webpages. > Perhaps VPC on Apptel will work better than currently, and those > that need to run the occasional Windows app on their Powerbook will > benefit, but I'd expect to find plenty of apps having problems. It > is a shame - I'd love to be able to play Windows games on my Mac. > > For the majority of Windows applications there is a Mac-native > equivalent, but for those users for whom a Windows-only app is > absolutely irreplaceable, I'll bet the best bet will still be a > £200 or £300 PC & VNC. > Indeed.... as long as they are on a network... and a fast one. I use VNC at the office to connect to my WIntel machine running XP so I can use my calendar app.. but when I'm at home (dialup) or... (shock!) offline, say, on an airplane, it's less useful. TjL