[X4U] Re: Apple's move to Intel chips
Stroller
MacMonster at myrealbox.com
Thu Jun 9 06:08:06 PDT 2005
On Jun 9, 2005, at 8:14 am, Timothy Luoma wrote:
>
>> Perhaps VPC on Apptel will work better than currently, and those that
>> need to run the occasional Windows app on their Powerbook will
>> benefit, but .... I'll bet the best bet will still be a £200 or £300
>> PC & VNC.
>>
>
> Indeed.... as long as they are on a network... and a fast one.
>
> I use VNC at the office ... but when I'm at home (dialup) or...
> (shock!) offline, say, on an airplane, it's less useful.
There was a reason I mentioned the Powerbook in my first sentence! ;)
It would be nice if the switch to Intel improved emulation of Windows
apps, but the problem is that emulation will always be an overhead, and
I don't believe it will ever be 100% reliable.
There are estate agents & financial consultants I would LOVE to switch
off Windows, but who rely on a single proprietary app for managing
their properties or calculating mortgages - I cannot recommend
Macintosh & VPC to them. Even if a hypothetical WINE-on-Mac were to
work perfectly for this app today, what is to say that an upgrade won't
break it? The suppliers of the proprietary software won't support it,
and if it's a paid-for enhancement like VPC it increases the initial
cost of the switch. You & I know that the cost of the switch will be
paid for by maintenance & upgrade savings, but short-term cost can be
extremely off-putting to customers.
Had Macintosh 50% of the market, then I'm sure we'd see reliable
emulators on both sides, and fantastic peer-support. But I _personally_
don't see the Macintel improving the situation to the point where we
can throw away our PCs (unless you consider dual-booting a Mac to
Windows acceptable).
Stroller.
More information about the X4U
mailing list