There are a couple (at least) of different "types" of speech recognition... what is built-in to OS X is capable of "recognizing" commands (this is similar technology to voice based automated telephone systems), but is not capable of "recognizing" the spoken word to turn it into text (which requires a very different technology). For transcription, you need something like ViaVoice or iListen. You can find iListen here: http://www.macspeech.com -- I don't know the current status of ViaVoice, it was done by IBM, but I think they may have abandoned it. However, as I already mentioned, these programs have to learn the individual's patterns of speech, intonation, etc. to get accurate results. If you've got a good quality audio recording, you *might* be able to get a reasonable first take at a transcription, but expect *lots* of errors since there will be voices on there that the program has not been trained with. For my time and money, sending my dissertation research interviews to a transcriptionist was the only way to go. Scott On Oct 7, 2005, at 3:40 PM, Matt Gregory wrote: > Something that would autogenerate at least a first cut at text > would have been like a godsend to her. Not giving up on that > though. It may not be built into OS X (I'm on 10.4.2 btw) out of > the box, but it's obviously able to recognize speech ... so is it > hackable, or AppleScriptable?