[X4U] Re: Emergency post / Disk recovery vs file undelete
PoolMouse
poolmouse_nyc at mac.com
Tue Sep 20 17:07:53 PDT 2005
Nick Scalise <nickscalise at cox.net> wrote:
> > From: PoolMouse <poolmouse_nyc at mac.com>
>>
>> Verduron <verduron at comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> >Any recommendations? TIA
>>
>> get a backup system in place and restore accidentally deleted files
>> from your backups. whether you use drives, tapes, cd's, etc., backing
>> up is the best insurance you have against data loss....whether
>> accidental or because of failure, disaster, theft, etc. i'm sure some
>> company will market something that'll promise to recover deleted
>> files. i would stay away from anything like that. instead, apple
>> should be petitioned to offer customers a choice of writing to the
>> oldest drive space as opposed to the newest (which is what happens
>> now).
>
>At first, you write that "some company will market something that'll promise
>to recover deleted files" and then state "i would stay away from anything like
>that". And then later you state that Apple should allow "writing to the oldest
>drive space as opposed to the newest".
>
>That last sentence to me means that Apple currently is writing to areas of the
>disk that have had the most recent file activity, is this correct?
>If that is so,
>and undelete utilities are futile, what does it matter how Apple writes to the
>disk?
undelete utilities are a farce because osx writes to the newest areas
of the drive first. if not, then undelete would make sense i suppose.
i only trust restores from backups.
don
More information about the X4U
mailing list