Simple (to use) is hard isn't it. I've found simpler for the end user requires a lot more engineering and forethought. But for the people I have to help on a daily basis no matter how "simple" something is they can't figure it out. Some quote I read regarding software design said that not matter how idiot proof software becomes the universe just produces better idiots. On 7/2/06 5:39 PM, "Eugene" <list-themacintoshguy at fsck.net> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 09:04:02AM CST, Richard Gilmore <rgilmor at uwo.ca> > wrote: > : > : Simplicity is outlawed today. But applications were simple ?back then? > : because programming and computers in general were ?simple? especially > : compared with today. But tomorrow?s apps are going to make today?s look > : simple too. I don?t think anything today can be marketed as ?simple? though > : because it will be criticized as hobbled or having ?few features and > : functionality.? People today expect the apps they buy or use to be capable > : of anything and if they buy software package Y and then discover that it > : can?t do this or that (no matter how trivial) but if they only bought > : software package X it could do all that and more then they?re going to feel > : stupid or ripped off and they?ll never buy Y again and Y will be out of > : business so fast. The competition in the computer world is fierce. Nothing > : can be marketed as simple anymore. > > Simple is easy. Simple-to-use is hard. The real problem is > that most industries today are not interested in working on > solutions that are too hard. >