> As for Adobe...I'm on an Intel iMac right now and I work in a media > centre > where I use Photoshop and InDesign all the time and I am > disappointed that > there won't be Intel versions of CS until 2007. That's waaaaayyy > too long in > my books. It does seem like a slap in face we don't give a shit > attitude. I > think that's a bad sign for Apple. While Photoshop and InDesign do > run under > Rosetta they are slower than my previous 1.8 G5 and I feel like > I've taken a > step back. I don't know if that's because Jobs got the Intels out > faster > than originally forecast or if Apple didn't work closely enough > with Adobe > in the lead up to the switch or if Adobe really just wants to cut > out of > Apple all together. All I know is I don't like it. I hear ya. I wonder if it is simply Adobe allocating appropriate resources given the market and forecasted profits from an universal binary (yin-yang disk). I also wonder if Adobe is kinda gently slapping Jobs back for his Aperture, Final Cut Pro, and Pages... All of which compete at least obliquely with Adobe products. A sorta, "well show you how much you need us..." move. Which usually backfires in the end, so I doubt that is what is going on. Steve