This "story" strikes me as crazy. If Apple were going to "dump" OSX why not make it open source, give it to the world, the open source community will make it so it'll run on any PC or Apple product and then see how much market share it would take. I'm sure many people would opt for OSX. It would be bound hurt MS market penetration. As for Adobe...I'm on an Intel iMac right now and I work in a media centre where I use Photoshop and InDesign all the time and I am disappointed that there won't be Intel versions of CS until 2007. That's waaaaayyy too long in my books. It does seem like a slap in face we don't give a shit attitude. I think that's a bad sign for Apple. While Photoshop and InDesign do run under Rosetta they are slower than my previous 1.8 G5 and I feel like I've taken a step back. I don't know if that's because Jobs got the Intels out faster than originally forecast or if Apple didn't work closely enough with Adobe in the lead up to the switch or if Adobe really just wants to cut out of Apple all together. All I know is I don't like it. Richard On 17/2/06 5:50 AM, "Kunga" <Kunga at FutureMedia.org> wrote: > Well I don't know why anyone here bothered to hit the link and read > his tripe. I certainly didn't. I don't need to read him cause I know > his style which is to write nonsense. I just enjoyed all of our > comments instead. ; ^ ) > > The newbie's fears are totally unwarranted and I look forward to a > future where PPC Macs and Intel Macs live side by side in peaceful > harmony saving the world from Windoze bigotry and belligerence > through an enlightened Universal Mac OS X Leopard and beyond. > > I can't wait for Leopard to pounce on my Quad and crank up its > performance in 2007 - for a few months anyway until I can get my > hands on an 8 core Mac Pro. GOD this Quad is WEAK. ; ^ ) ; ^ P