Unless you need the rack mount capability or any of the other features (hot swappable power supplies, etc) that make the X-Server a 'server' instead of a 'workstation . . .then I think that a Mac Pro (or heck, even an iMac) would make a find server for a 6 practitioner medical practice. File sharing, mail if you need it, Filemaker Pro server . . .a Mac Pro will handle all of that just fine. As to remote management . . .you can always buy a copy of OS X Server and install on it . . .but unless remote administration is a real requirement then there probably isn't anything that actually requires the Server vice Client version of OS X. You could use the XServe as a regular workstation . . .but the extra fans it has and the 'must be rack mounted' case make it probably a less than satisfactory workstation. Based on your statements of the needs and requirements . . .the X- Serve is nice . . . but way overkill. Performance wise . . .even a Mac Mini would probably be more than sufficient. An iMac is definitely sufficient . . .but you might want to buy the Mac Pro so that you can have multiple drives for backup, redundancy, etc. On Jan 23, 2007, at 08:43, Jim Robertson wrote: > My 6-practitioner nephrology medical practice is about to take its > first > steps into the late 20th century. We'll be implementing an electronic > appointment book, and we'll be configuring it so that the docs and > staff > (those with appropriate privileges) will have web access to it. > > We're looking at a product created in FileMaker Pro as well as some > others. > Ideally, I'd like to configure it so that users could get secure > (https) > access, which I understand means using FileMaker Server (actually, > FileMaker > Server Advanced to get web accessibility). > > As we purchase hardware to accomplish this, one issue is what we > need as a > server computer. My limited understanding is that major advantages of > Apple's X-serve hardware include the ability to administer it remotely > (which I likely would be called upon to do), as well as auto- > recovery after > power failures. The X-serve computers are EXPENSIVE; I'm wondering > if the > major reason they're expensive is because they come bundled with OS > X server > software. > > Can an X-serve also function as a routine workstation? In other > words, could > I use one of those as my routine workstation as well? I think we have > adequate network and hardware (all cabling is cat-5e, and we have > gigabit > switches, 4 static ip addresses from our ISP, and an 802.11n (draft) > wireless router. > > Most of the clients for the appointments program will be on > Windows. I'm > told that the server can be Mac OS with no problems because FMP is > truly > cross-platform. Anyone know of real issues there? It might make > sense to use > a windows box as the server because future network applications may > well be > Windows only; However, we're still a year or two away from > implementations > such as electronic medical records because the solutions that WORK are > horrendously expensive ($50,000 to $100,000 per physician), and > there's as > yet no viable model regarding who should or can pay for this. So, > as long as > we're starting with a web-accessible FMP database, I think it makes > sense to > use a Mac as the server because I can get up to speed more quickly > on the > platform I understand the best. > > At the moment we're in the earliest phases of considering this, so I'm > basically just looking for general information regarding hardware/ > server > OS/use of the server simultaneously as a workstation/FileMaker > cross-platform issues, etc. > > Thanks so much, > > Jim Robertson > -- > > > > _______________________________________________ > X4U mailing list > X4U at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x4u > > Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random > stuff: > http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984