On 23 Jan 2007, at 13:43, Jim Robertson wrote: > My 6-practitioner nephrology medical practice is about to take its > first > steps into the late 20th century. We'll be implementing an electronic > appointment book, and we'll be configuring it so that the docs and > staff > (those with appropriate privileges) will have web access to it. What the others said re hardware. Have you considering holding off until Leopard server & using iCal? Using iCal Server, colleagues can propose and set up meetings, book conference rooms, and more quickly and easily [sic] . iCal Server is a full-featured, standards-based calendaring solution designed to make your life easier. http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/leopard/icalserver.html Microsoft's Exchange Server is the equivalent for Outlook users, and is very well entrenched. It offers facilities for a secretary to approve appointments on her boss' behalf and all the stuff I mentioned before <http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/pipermail/x4u/ 2006-August/014409.html>. I see from the spiel that it allows you to reserve shared "assets" such as a projector (x-ray machine?) or conference room; I find it hard to imagine that it might not offer shared address-book features. I have no experience of File Maker Pro - I've never encountered anyone using it on Windows (certainly none of my 600+ customers) and I have to admit that I look down on it as a snotty little old- fashioned database program that's "not a real server". There has been quite a bit of interest recently from governments in requiring all documents to be in formats with open standards, and IMO this bodes well for Apple's support of CalConnect.org with iCal server - for me, I don't see how a proprietary app like FMP could compete with this. iCal Server is ALREADY available as open source. See also http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/ical.html Stroller.