Unless the part of the drive that contained important information about the backed up files became inaccessible/corrupted.... But a thought worthy of further investigation nonetheless. Coj On 08/11/2007, at 12:29 PM, Jim Robertson wrote: > On 11/7/07 3:21 PM, "Robert Ameeti" <Robert at Ameeti.net> wrote: > >> Time Machine has to get a good read before it can do a write. > > I'm curious. The original poster didn't know his internal drive was > bad, > which means it apparently wasn't having frequent problems in > ordinary use. > If there were FREQUENT problems, wouldn't they be apparent to a > well-designed backup utility; i.e., shouldn't it verify its reads/ > writes as > it does its job? > > If I read the original poster's original report correctly, Time > Machine > didn't complain at all while filling up 43 gigabytes of his backup > disk, but > then had nothing available for him when he tried to find either a > single > file or anything at all. > > I wouldn't be happy about that if I'd paid for the backup software! > > Jim Robertson > -- > > > > _______________________________________________ > X4U mailing list > X4U at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x4u > > Seven Cent Deals - Great legacy stuff Great Legacy Price > http://www.drbott.com/prod/db.lasso?cat=Seven+Cent+Deal