Mine, too. I usually trade in Macs every 2 years or so. Of course, as my wife says: Dont drink, dont smoke, what do you do? :-) _________________________ Sent from my phone--so replies might be short. On Jun 16, 2008, at 6:50 PM, Tim Collier <tim_collier at bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On 6/16/08 7:28 PM, "Michael Elliott" wrote an exciting message > that when I > read it on 6/16/08 7:28 PM, I became so enthusiastic, I was forced > to take > an extra Xanax 1 mg. > >> Hi Tim, >> >> Those people will be just fine without buying a new TV. If they're >> on >> cable, then no difference. If they're on over-the-air broadcasts, >> then they'll just need a set-top box to receive the signal on their >> 1982 Zenith Color TV :-) >> >> After hearing my wife curse over and over last night about trying to >> watch the Tonys on our Cox digital cable, I can attest that I have >> seen MUCH more signal issues with digital TV than I ever did with >> regular analog. No, I couldn't watch an HDTV channel with analog. >> But on our Cox cable in the periphery of their coverage area, we >> get a >> lot of digital artifacts/garbled audio/frozen video for a half a >> second or so. I wonder why our digital TV doesn't buffer the signal >> until it's "perfect" before showing it to our screen? I never get >> digital artifacts with HULU.com >> >> Which brings us back to the original issue of technological progress: >> if it works great for you, then no reason to upgrade :-) >> >> Michael >> >> > > Thanks Michael: > Yes, I am aware that in February of 2009, you will still be able to > view > stations provided they are via cable or any converter box. That has > been > widely publicized and I believe is known by most of the American > viewing > audience. > But the issue under discussion was the doubts and fears of those who > were > fearing the end of PowerPC support from Apple and then went on to > discuss > the iPhone and then the various people were said that they didn't > own a cell > phone and were happy about that fact. > Apple no longer supports Macs with the motorola chip, it is a natural > progression, they now use Intel chips so the natural progression > would be to > drop support for the IBM based Macs. This makes perfect sense to me. > As for your last statement "if it works great for you, then no > reason to > upgrade", I know that there is a significant number of Mac users who > feel > that way and that's their choice. But, they are also at risk of > losing the > ability to use the newer software and hardware, again their choice. > Me, I like to upgrade my Mac about every 12 to 18 months, my choice. > > -- > Tim Collier > MacBook 2.2 gig 2 gig RAM > http://www.timcolliermiami.com/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > X4U mailing list > X4U at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x4u > > Seven Cent Deals - Great legacy stuff Great Legacy Price > http://www.drbott.com/prod/db.lasso?cat=Seven+Cent+Deal