On Mar 25, 2009, at 12:33 AM, Randy B. Singer wrote: > > On Mar 24, 2009, at 8:36 PM, Ed Gould wrote: > >> I guess we agree to disagree on this one Randy. Although the >> support was there (for this issue) I find the pay before you try >> is pushing the edge (for me). > > As I have told you, and as it clearly says on the SuperDuper! Web > site, and as several people here have now told you also, > SuperDuper! will allow you to do an entire and complete clone of > your drive, FOR FREE. > > True, it does not have all of its features without paying. If you > expect a piece of commercial software to have 100% of its > capabilities prior to paying for it, you are living in the past. > That old shareware model doesn't work. At least not if a developer > expects to make a decent return for their investment of time. > Maybe I am not making myself clear. The *ONE* feature that I am interested in is backup. Their backup idea is *NOT* even close to what I would consider proper. They wipe out the receiving drive at first I didn't believe it so I asked and sure enough it *DOES*). I am shocked that they would take that approach personally. That means essential you have to dedicate a drive to each back that you want to do. I have two drives so if I get a terabyte drive I would have to change it into about 5 or so partitions. I guess I am sort of OK to do this with a boot drive (as it has to be boot-able but I will be dammed to have to separate the 5 remainders into partitions for the data portion. I can understand their partitioning (sort of but still iffy) if you do not need more than one backup copy. I maintain 3 (current, last week and two weeks ago). Also its sort of bad if you say you have a power outage in the middle of the backup process as you have to start over or your backup drives will be out of sync. I was afraid I was going to get into this conversation with die hard supporters. Go ahead use the product if it fits your needs, this one does not fit my needs. Ed