At 8:22 PM -0600 2/2/10, Nick Scalise wrote: >On Feb 2, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Zane H. Healy wrote: > >>I'd be interested in knowing what you base the claim that Apple was the >>driving force away from SCSI and floppy drives. The PC desktop world never >>really went with SCSI, just high-end workstations. It was SAS that did SCSI >>in. As for floppies, they remained on PC's until flash drives became >>common. >> >>Yes, Apple drove the usage of USB and Firewire, but Firewire is sadly well >>on its way to becoming irrelevant. I rather hope that the next Mac Pro >>includes either USB3, or eSATA ports, in addition to Firewire ports. Have >>you looked recently for *new* Firewire devices? > > >SAS is SCSI - Serially Attached SCSI. > >So you can't really say that SAS did in SCSI. Good point, the worst part, I know what SAS means, and was even thinking about it while I wrote that. :-) The real beauty of you pointing this out though, is that it shows the insanity of the claim Apple was the driving force away from SCSI, as the high-end disk drives they use are SAS. :-) Zane -- | Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator | | healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast | | MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector | +----------------------------------+----------------------------+ | Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, | | PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. | | http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |