On Feb 10, 2010, at 2:00 PM, Chris Jones wrote: > Nonsense. Its more than ready. Its not SL's fault if there are some > applications out there that require ancient obsoletel (i.e. Apple > talk) technology ... that is one viewpoint. However, most people don't buy a Mac so that they can stare at it and drool, basking in the glow of how cool it might be in theory. Most people buy a Mac to do real work. So, if an OS "breaks" a bunch of apps, that doesn't make the OS "modern" and the broken apps "obsolete." It simply means that the new OS is not production-ready. Apple itself has essentially admitted that Snow Leopard will have to evolve over time, as any OS or revision does. What makes the most sense to me, and what I have done is this: create a Snow Leopard parition, and continue to have partitions for other OS X versions in which everything works. As Snow updaters are released. and application revisions are released, you can add them over time and end up with a functional, production-ready install. Not one that's mostly ready, or "ready in theory," if only all the other developers would simply snap-to and fix their apps to work with Snow. zc