Will it give problems to have more than one OS in the same Mac? Paul Moortgat On 10 Feb 2010, at 23:03, zapcat wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2010, at 2:00 PM, Chris Jones wrote: > >> Nonsense. Its more than ready. Its not SL's fault if there are some >> applications out there that require ancient obsoletel (i.e. Apple >> talk) technology ... > > > that is one viewpoint. However, most people don't buy a Mac so that > they can stare at it and drool, basking in the glow of how cool it > might be in theory. > > Most people buy a Mac to do real work. So, if an OS "breaks" a bunch > of apps, that doesn't make the OS "modern" and the broken apps > "obsolete." > > It simply means that the new OS is not production-ready. Apple > itself has essentially admitted that Snow Leopard will have to > evolve over time, as any OS or revision does. > > What makes the most sense to me, and what I have done is this: > create a Snow Leopard parition, and continue to have partitions for > other OS X versions in which everything works. As Snow updaters are > released. and application revisions are released, you can add them > over time and end up with a functional, production-ready install. > > Not one that's mostly ready, or "ready in theory," if only all the > other developers would simply snap-to and fix their apps to work > with Snow. > > zc