At 12:19 PM +1100 1/30/11, Bernard Munter wrote: >Adding to this, I use an Epson V700 and check the histogram in the scanning >software (Epson) interface after the 'preview' and prior to the actual scan. >That way there is less mangling of levels in Photoshop, resulting in >banding, etc. > >I usually do a final Levels tweak of levels post-scan, but the adjustment is >usually minor. I'm still on 10.5, so YMMV. I've never used VueScan, but I'd >assume it has a histogram adjustment interface. > >Getting a 'good' initial scan is key to success. I never had a lot of luck with the histogram on EpsonScan for my Epson 2400 or 2450. Even when I appear to have a good one, once I get it into Photoshop I typically need to adjust the levels. On VueScan I hadn't even figured out how to display it (you got me thinking and I think I've found it), but I get good solid scans with a good histogram when I open it in Lightroom or Photoshop. I've barely used VueScan with the 2450, but have scanned a lot of 35mm using the Nikon Coolscan IV ED and VueScan. I highly recommend it, you can download a fully functional demo, that puts watermarks on your scans and give it a try if you want. With a V700 you'll be able to continue using EpsonScan. The 2400 and 2450 are so old that they dropped support with 10.6. Zane -- | Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator | | healyzh at aracnet.com | OpenVMS Enthusiast | | | Photographer | +----------------------------------+----------------------------+ | My flickr Photostream | | http://www.flickr.com/photos/33848088@N03/ |