On 30/01/11 175631, "Zane H. Healy" <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote: > At 12:19 PM +1100 1/30/11, Bernard Munter wrote: >> Getting a 'good' initial scan is key to success. > > I never had a lot of luck with the histogram on EpsonScan for my Epson 2400 or > 2450. Even when I appear to have a good one, once I get it into Photoshop I > typically need to adjust the levels. You are quite correct in this. I did say I re-check the histogram in Photoshop. But the amount of Photoshop correction needed is less when I have done a quick levels check on the preview in Epson's software, so the scan has captured _most_ of what is on the print or film. If I wasn't as obsessed with my scans looking 'zippy' it probably wouldn't matter! > On VueScan I hadn't even figured out how to display it (you got me thinking > and I think I've found it), but I get good solid scans with a good histogram > when I open it in Lightroom or Photoshop. That's good! > I've barely used VueScan with the 2450, but have scanned a lot of 35mm using > the Nikon Coolscan IV ED and VueScan. I highly recommend it, you can download > a fully functional demo, that puts watermarks on your scans and give it a try > if you want. > Colour me tempted. The Epson software is, well, a bit clunky to say the least. The TWAIN interface or whatever leaves my Preferences folder full of junk I have to delete manually. Something makes the scanner 'lock up' after a while and I have to unplug the I/O connection (Firewire or USB) and power-cycle the V700 to get the thing to work again. If I forget, and have to re-boot the computer (Intel iMac) all hell breaks loose until I remember to disconnect the scanner from the computer. It _could_ be a hardware problem in the scanner, but VueScan might be more friendly to my system. Sorry to vent. Thanks! --