At 9:30 AM -0700 11/1/11, catsoul wrote: >http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/10/31/despite_new_cpu_options_apple_reportedly_questioning_future_of_mac_pro.html > >thoughts on this story? I purchase my Mac Pro about a year ago, in person, at one of the Apple Stores. When I did, I had two managers talking to me. They were seriously interested as to why I was buying it. I learned that basically no private individual buy's Mac Pro's anymore, and they were amazed that I was. One slight problem, I'm very sersious about my photography. I need more than just the 4 internal drives for my Photoshop configuration. I also have a 2 drive eSATA RAID, and a Drobo. This doesn't include the FW800 doc for doing offsite backups (once I buy the drives to do them). I also have 24Gb of RAM, and at times I wish I had more. Thus my important to factors are RAM and Disk Space. I went with the 8-core model to get 8 RAM slots vs. 4 slots. I basically never put a noticable load on my CPU's. With my old Dual 2Ghz G5 PowerMac I almost always had the CPU's and RAM pegged. My old G4/450 PowerMac just plain wanted to melt down under the load. What I'm saying is that the new Mac Pro's are amazing machines and honestly CPU wise, overkill. What Apple needs to do is bring out a new desktop that can use standard desktop CPU's, and support a boatload of RAM and drives. Very, very few people need the CPU power of a current Mac Pro. Zane -- | Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator | | healyzh at aracnet.com | OpenVMS Enthusiast | | | Photographer | +----------------------------------+----------------------------+ | My flickr Photostream | | http://www.flickr.com/photos/33848088@N03/ |