Clamshell vs. IceBook
Robert R. Daniel
rrdaniel2 at mac.com
Mon Nov 25 17:51:50 PST 2002
For traveling, I am certain the clamshell is a better choice.
It's much sturdier and will stand up to the stress of being
jammed into an overstuffed backpack or carry-on bag. I have
handled the IceBook and now have a TiBook at work. I would be
very reluctant to travel with either of them. I certainly
would not schlep them between office and home when I commute
by bicycle. With my clamshell, on the other hand, I have no
hesitation: I pack it and go.
Of course, depending on your use, a TiBook can be a huge
improvement over a Clamshell. The screen is huge and
brilliant and clear. It runs faster (and hotter!) and has
a whole bunch of advantages over the clamshell: internal
DVD/CDRW drive, OS X, Firewire & 2 USB ports. In essence,
the TiBook is (for me) a desktop machine that I *can* move
around if I need to, but which I rarely choose to do because
I am afraid I may damage the screen or scratch the case.
The Clamshell --as Charles Martin suggests-- is more than
sufficient \for doing a bit of word processing and other
simple, uncomplicated, processor non-intensive tasks like
checking mail or manipulating small image or data
files.
My $0.02.
Robert
More information about the iBook
mailing list