On Saturday, Jan 4, 2003, at 12:18 US/Central, Peter Nacken wrote: > Mac.com .. 99$ .. Less the stellar performance .. I kept it because I > like > my mac.com address and I got it for 49$ .. But I will most likey not > continue come next september .. The address is spam infested and I am > dissapointed by the performance .. Uploads to iDisc take way to long > .. And > I do not mean mere upload time .. But processing time .. I have to agree. I too thought that the .Mac package was worth $49.00 not $99.00. iDisk has improved but in terms of performance but it is still a poor way to transfer information to and from a server. I like the .mac address and would continue to pay a few dollars a month to keep it. As for the rest of the package, there are many superior ways to do what .Mac and iDisk do for a lot less money. As Apple continues to entice with their initially no or low cost and then you must pay tactics for software and services I am more inclined to think twice about the Apple software and services I need and use.