At 9:31 PM -0600 1/4/03, Eric B. Richardson wrote: (deletia) > Your real bias >was evident when you decided to post the utterly ignorant crap about >Clinton being the most effective president, not just more than Bush, >but more than any president in American history. What a load. You act >like a teenager with a crush. What I said was he was the most effective president in our lifetime and I stand by it. Peace in the world, prosperity at home, fiscal solvency and the longest expansion of the American economy in history, that is the Clinton record. Would that Bush could get any of this right. Regime change, like charity, begins at home. (more deletia) > >Including the option to bow down and kiss the Iraqi trained and >funded terrorists' jackboots? You will find that the terrorists are trained and financed more by Saudis than the Iraquis. Until recently we were the ones training and equipping them. And are you aware of the links between the Carlyle Group, the administration and the Saudi royal family? (still more irrelevant deletia) >Somewhere I misplaced the place where you said that Bush was >unelected. He was clearly elected by the only vote that counts the >electoral college. This is where I will make my final point and have no more to say on this topic on this list. I was about to suggest we take this argument off list until I came to this point and realized there is no sense arguing with some one so little constrained by actual fact. Gore won the popular vote and the only vote GeoW won was from 5 members of the Supreme Court, in a decision so reaking of pure political opportunism that the other four Justices took extraordinary steps to distance themselves from it. You may or may not recall, but that decision stopped the valid recount of ballots in Florida. Between the votes cast for Gore and Nader, the American people actually voted a strong repudiation of the unmandated coup de etat government now in power. Anyone who can count can verify this for themself. I am now ready to go back to the true purpose of this list, but do not for a moment think that my future silence is anything like assent for the ill-informed arguments you presented. I suggest you take your arguments to some forum of informed political observers and watch them get shredded. Or you can just stick with Rush and the other dittoes.