On Sunday, January 26, 2003, at 06:43 PM, Jack Rodgers wrote: > On Sunday, January 26, 2003, at 02:26 PM, Brian Pearce wrote: > >> I think the point I was trying to make is that many people take these >> positions based largely on an irrational fear of Microsoft, without >> having any real knowledge or understanding of what the company does >> that one might find so objectionable. They dislike Microsoft mostly >> because it *is* Microsoft. > > Microsoft produces server software that is insecure and it provides > visual basic which is a favorite tool for email viruses. It also is > trying to pry into everyone's computer. It does not follow industry > standards but tries to control them as can be seen in html and java. > And it has a long history of crushing competitors by its monopoly in > operating system software. There used to be 20 years ago 10-20 > operating systems. > > Perhaps you need more information on what the company does to help you > form your opnion? :) > > Microsoft has become a state sanctioned monopoly in a way and a monopoly with none of the responsibilities of something like the old AT&T. But I think Linux and open source will begin to become a business efficiency that will change the tech landscape. This might start first with servers in the business world. Unfortunately, the University I work at has just begun to expand the influence of Microsoft servers but I hope this trend is reversed. Donald