> Do content-providers really, truly believe the audience will buy > multiples > of CDs/DVDs depending on where they want to play it? Oh, please. That has *nothing* to do with the region coding scheme employed in DVDs. You may disagree with them (and mostly this seems to be because they inconvenience you), but there are quite reasonable explanations for why the system was put into place. Apart from the different theatrical "windows" in place worldwide (where a DVD release in one country may come before the theatrical release in another), seperate distribution agreements may govern material in different parts of the world. (Most companies wouldn't want to put too much money into licensing material if they knew it could be easily imported and sold to their audience.) In fact, without region coding and encryption, I doubt the major studios would have embraced the DVD format at all. They're easily circumvented without too much trouble, and it's an inconvenience I'm willing to live with; especially if this is the difference between having material released on DVD and *not* having material released on DVD. Besides which, there's /already/ a system very much like region coding in place that has traditionally restricted the material that can be played in different regions without specialised equipment; incompatable television standards. Your friend would likely need a player capable of transcoding the signal from SECAM (if I'm not mistaken) to NTSC to play his French DVD in the US. (Most of those end up set to bypass region coding, anyway.) BRIAN/bpearce at cloud9.net