Interesting arguments, though I don't concur with some of them. On 14 Jul 2003, Brian Pearce wrote: : Oh, please. That has *nothing* to do with the region coding scheme : employed in DVDs... : You may disagree with them (and mostly this seems to be because they : inconvenience you) I disagree with encoding for two reasons: overly profit-thinking and inconvenience. There. I said it *s* No need to get condescending though, right? And true: better DVD with circumventable limitations than no DVD at all. : On 14 July 2003, George Slusher wrote: : : There was great resistance among the studios to DVDs : because the quality is so good: they were afraid that : they would easily be copied. : : ... I, and other fans... think that this is because : the program's owners and distributors want to preserve the : syndication value of reruns. Sounds like profit-orientation to me. Understandable to some degree; studios are not charitable institutions. : As for the "legal" issues, perhaps someone who think sthat DVD : encoding is illegal can cite a specific Federal statute (or : equivalent law outside the US), treaty, or Constitutional provision. : As Brian said, it seems that some people think that anything that is : inconvenient for them is, by necessity, illegal. I must have overlooked that and can't find *any* reference to legality except in George's e-mail. Did someone really label region-encoding "illegal"? I hope we all agree: asking for region-free capabilities does not make one a pirate. Does it? Cheers, -tobias.