On 2003-09-21 03:29, david wrote: > On 9/20/03 8:37 PM, "Joost van de Griek" <joost at jvdg.net> wrote: > >> On 2003-09-20 16:19, david wrote: >> >>> What's the use of having mobility if you are tied to a phone/ethernet cord? >> >> Well, I wired my entire house with Ethernet (including a port on each side of >> the bed, and even one in the bathroom), so I have no immediate need for a >> wireless network... Besides, I doubt my employer would appreciate my >> broadcasting work-related data on WiFi. > > My house is wired too - installed it when we ran new electrics. But there is a > big difference between being tied to a cord (no matter how convenient it is) > and being wireless. I can work in the yard, go next door, roam the building at > work, sit at the coffeehouse, even perch the computer on my '57 Chevy and > search for a part. I have no yard, no business going next door, an AirPort network at home wouldn't do much for roaming at work, and I don't own a car. My point is simply that not everyone uses their computers in the same manner. > Besides, you¹ve never heard of WEP? Yes, I have. Despite its name, any encryption can be cracked, and cracking WEP isn't even all that hard. Neither is gaining access to a protected WiFi network. > And, having an airport card doesn't mean you can't use a wire if you and the > boss are paranoid about WiFi. Of course, being tethered to a wire doesn't mean > you are secure. I am not paranoid, I just happen to work with very sensitive data. I know being tethered to a wire doesn't mean you're secure, but it is still way more secure than literally broadcasting your network traffic into a 50 meter radius. ,xtG .tsooJ -- Why do people with closed minds always open their mouths? -- Joost van de Griek <http://www.jvdg.net/>