Good point, Kirk. I have an IBM ThinkPad T series laptop at work, which has a resolution of 1400 * 1050, so I think I'm just getting used to the extra screen space available on that screen. But you're absolutely right, scaling that screen down to a different resolution is not a good idea. The ThinkPad screen looks dreadful at 1024 * 768. So, maybe the iBook's screen as-is serves the majority of people better. And I'll probably need to get a stronger prescription for my contact lenses if I continue to use the IBM laptop at work. :-) - Mike W. Kirk McElhearn wrote: > On 9/27/04 6:06 AM, "Mike Wallinga" <mwallinga at mailup.net> wrote: > > >>So, if I could refresh the iBook line, I would keep a resolution of >>1024*768 on the 12 inch model, and make the 14 inch screen 1280 * 1024. >>Throw in the normal incremental processor, video, and disk upgrades, and >>I'd be reaching for my wallet! :-) > > > I for one wouldn't be able to read what's on screen very well. The problem > with LCD screens is that you can't change the resolution as you can on a > CRT. I don't think a tighter resolution would suit most people. > > > Kirk