I'd love to see a link to that article if anyone has it. I don't see it in the archive section of that site. Jeff On 8/24/05, Ben Chong <bluesky6 at ix.netcom.com> wrote: > An article on a Mac website (I think it's lowendmac.com) talked about > speed comparisons between a 256MB and a 512MB iBook to see if the > extra 256MB made a difference. > > The conclusion was that there was no difference when the app(s) are > up and running but that starting an app was faster on the system with > more memory. > > Tiger (that's the only OS X I'm familiar with) does a good job of > making apps appear responsive across different CPU speeds. My kids > use a 500MHz 578MB iBook and I have a 1.33MHz/1.5GB one and other > than application launch times, the responsiveness (including web > browsing) is almost the same. > > I cannot say that same thing about OS 8.x running on a 180MHz 3400c > that we also have. So slooooow...... > > Ben > > > _______________________________________________ > iBook mailing list > iBook at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/ibook > > Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random stuff: > http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984 >