[iTunes] Re: MP3 vs AAC
Jeremy Kezer
itunes at kezer.net
Wed Apr 30 04:39:36 PDT 2003
>As I understand it, both compressions are about 10:1.
I don't know, but if you compress them at the same bit rate, the
files are roughly equivalent in size. The advantage to AAC is that
you can achieve similar quality with a lower bit rate. I compared
several songs ripped at 192kbps MP3 with songs ripped at 128kbps AAC
and could discern no difference. What I've chose to do is to start
re-ripping favorite CD's at 160kbps AAC which will supposedly give me
better quality than my 192kbps MP3's. For some comparison:
Fat Chance - Biscuit Boy
192kbps MP3 - 71.0MB
160kbps AAC - 53.4MB
So, about a 30% savings that achieves higher quality.
Jeremy
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
jeremy at kezer.net http://www.kezer.net/
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the iTunes
mailing list