Joe, for your use there isn't any situation were any G4 is better or faster. But, I suggest you hop over to Small Dog (http://www.smalldog.com/category/x/x/Power+Macintosh/g5+minitower/wag100/wag10000/) and look at the refurbished 1.8 gig G5 single processor. It is cheaper than the 1.6 G5 and a much better motherboard. The Small Dog RAM prices are very good, also. For a pleasant and helpful purchasing experience call on the phone and ask for Kieth (lowest man on the Totem Poll). I am not connected in any way or with anyone at Small Dog. I own a small and Mac consulting and graphics company, and I found Small Dog to give great service while minimizing the pain of spending my money. Apple refurbished macs have not been owned or used by anyone. As I understand it they result from unfulfilled purchases orders and contracts. They are not open box or cosmetic. They have been ordered at a point and the order was rejected; they are more like a restock. By law they cannot be sold as new. They carry the standard Apple new computer guarantee. Joe Sporleder wrote: > Both the G4 1.25Ghz DP and the G5 1.6Ghz are within my budget. Which > would be better, based on my uses as described above? It is my > understanding based on reviews and specs that I've read, that for most > things, the slowest G5 is still faster than the dual G4 1.25/1.42, > simply because of its faster system architecture, is this a correct > assumption? Configured with the same HD and Optical drives, the dual G4 > 1.25 and the G5 1.6 are basically the same price. Are there any > circumstances where the dual G4 would be better suited? > > Joe >