[MacDV] Re: DVD decoding quality Hardware vs. Software

[illovox at comcast.net]

I wasn't asking as a litmus, just curious.  The Lombard 400 is hardware
encoded too, it's just permanent on the MoBo.  I can tell you that the sw
encoding on my Pismo is flawless....

> From: FC Farwell <frankfarwell at mac.com>
> Reply-To: "A place to discuss digital video on Macintosh."
> <macdv at listserver.themacintoshguy.com>
> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:51:44 -0600
> To: macdv at listserver.themacintoshguy.com
> Subject: [MacDV] Re: DVD decoding quality Hardware vs. Software
> 
> 
> From: <illovox at comcast.net>
> 
>> 
>> 
>> do they work in x?
> 
> Run,
> This does not matter to me what matters is which does a better job of
> decoding and displaying, as a decent hardware decoder such as used on
> the WS 233-266-300 Mhz and Lombard 333 Mhz all used a hardware decoding
> solution. Later then that its all software decoded.
> 
> FC Farwell
> 
> The Future still holds all of God's promises yet unfulfilled. The
> present has all spiritual blessings for us now. The past reveals how
> faithful God is.
> fcf
> 
>> 
>>> From: FC Farwell <frankfarwell at mac.com>
>>> 
> 
>>> Subject: [MacDV] DVD decoding quality Hardware vs. Software
>>> 
>>> I wonder how the DVD quality is on the older Powerbooks with a DVD
>>> decoder card to the newer ones with software decoding.
>>> 
>>> FC Farwell
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MacDV mailing list
> MacDV at listserver.themacintoshguy.com
> http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/macdv
> 
> Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random stuff:
> http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984