[X-Apps] Junk filtering strategies in Mail
Gretchen Hayman
gretchen at sedl.org
Wed Mar 19 08:35:57 PST 2003
On Tuesday, Mar 18, 2003, at 10:22 US/Central, hart at nasw.org wrote:
> I'm several months down the road with Mail now, and, while in general
> the Junk filter does a good job, I'm seeing more false positives
> (legit mail filtered as junk). Any tips on most effectively using the
> filter? Should it be the last filter? That seems logical, in a way.
> Does the filter learn much when you click Not Junk?
Hi Stephen,
I've had extremely good "luck" with Mail's junk filtering. While it
does occasionally tag a few legit e-mails as Junk, I don't really get
too upset, as the e-mails generally fit the profile for spam. They are
usually auto-generated registration type e-mails that one gets after
registering a product/software. I used to get false positives on staff
e-mails from time to time, but then added a bit to my Junk filter which
seemed to help with that.
Here is how I have mine set up. I've put options in <>
- Junk rule is the LAST rule applied; Custom setup
Description: Junk
if <all> conditions met:
<Sender is not in my Address Book>
<Message is Junk Mail>
Then I transfer to a specific mailbox, so that I can check them out to
make sure there isn't legit e-mail getting through. (I also keep spam
to help test and train other spam filtering software.)
I think Mail does an excellent job, considering just how difficult it
is to write software to be "smart" enough to catch spam. IMO, 100%
accuracy for filtering spam is unattainable. People who think
otherwise should try writing their own software to see the challenge
involved. But again, that's MnsHO*. I'm happy with the ~95% accuracy
that Mail is providing me.
gretchen
*My not so Humble Opinion
More information about the X-Apps
mailing list