Here is something sort of funny I had a friend who believed - and shared the information with many - that as of January 1, 2003 - OS9 would simply refuse to boot on any machine at any time ever again (even if you set your clock back). So if you did not have OSX yet - you should go buy it and if you didn't, you would be in for a big surprise come that particular Wednesday morning. Priceless. On 12/3/02 12:01 PM, "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens at pursued-with.net> wrote: > > > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Albert W D'Amanda wrote: > >> >> On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 01:05 PM, Kevin Stevens wrote: >> >>> new *models* as of the 1st, not new *machines*. >>> >> >> samo-samo (same thing) >> >> "potatoes fried, potatoes boiled,either way its still potatoes" * >> >> albert > > Not at all. A 14" iBook made/sold in January would be able to boot OS 9; > it's the same model as it is today, though it is a machine/unit made in > 2003. > > I strongly doubt that Apple is going to go to whatever trouble necessary > to *break* OS 9 compatibility in the middle of a model production. It's > much more likely that new models will be designed/introduced without > backwards compatibility - and that's exactly what the news release I read > says. > > KeS Bill Reburn