On May 19, 2005, at 8:36 PM, Brian Durant wrote: > In my humble opinion, if top posting is not following net etiquette, > net etiquette should be changed. Why? Because many spell checking > programs slavishly check spelling from the top of any document, > including e-mails. that's what's wrong with the current process - its done in the way that serves the software, not the people who are using it. And not just software in general (my program, for example, checks from the cursor forward) but the lowest common denominator. This is a good example of why the RFCs were written to being with - when people start using the net, they just don't have the experience to distinguish a sound basis for such choices vs. a silly basis. In some environments nowadays, they'll never learn from experience. > I don't want to have to correct other people's > inarticulate gibberish before I can make sure that I am putting my > point across in an intelligible manner. Gee, let's re-write all the RFCs so that its convenient for you to spell check in your email program. Of course, if you had any experience at all, you'd know that this is a dead-end. Any rationale that starts with "my software does . . ." is a dead end because there will always be someone else with different software. That's why, back in the "old days" people who posted this kind of stuff were told to be quiet and go read the RFCs. But don't let decades of experience get in your way. > That is also a likely reasonwhy this is standard in the business > world. Its the standard in the business world because its the default Outlook behavior. > Don't get me started on > those people that insist on inserting their comments in between > snippets of replied to text :-) Lord no - wouldn't want the message to be intelligible . . . SR