On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 09:55:54AM CST, Zane H. Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote: > At 1:27 AM -0600 2/11/10, Eugene wrote: > >On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 04:54:34PM CST, zapcat <zapcat at speakeasy.net> wrote: > >> > >> No need to get worked up, John. I am not saying that SL is a > >> steaming pile, simply that it is for some, not production-ready. > > > >For some users who use certain apps or rely on certain functions, 10.6 > >may NEVER be production-ready. You can cherrypick any talking point to > >support any argument (e.g. my production equipment uses PowerMac G5s, > >Snow Leopard doesn't run on anything PowerPC, ergo Snow Leopard is not > >production ready). > > You know, this is one of the most sensible statements I've heard in > this thread. Thank you. :) > I really wish Apple would have sense enough to release an emulator > for those of us that need to run old software. I don't like the > idea that the only solutions in that area *ARE* opensource. > Honestly a good commercial emulator would smooth over all of my > complaints. What about running multiple versions of OS X on a single box via virtualization? Does Parallels stuff, like Server or Bare Metal, do this? I saw nothing from VMWare that does this for OS X. -- Eugene http://www.coxar.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/