While your points are correct, Richard, I think you are confusing upsampling with changing FCP's prefs for preview audio quality in this instance. The references to high and low audio quality were a sort of sidebar to his original beeping question, and not the sample rate. If the original poster did record his audio in the camera at 12 bit, 32 khz, then he should create a capture and sequence preset with that audio sample rate (by selecting DV NTSC and then Edit, changing the audio to 32 hz and then saving as something like DV NTSC 32) and then work entirely in 12 bit for that project. If he has a real need to have the output changed into 16 bit/48hz, then he can output as QT and change it there. sb On 11/25/02 12:18 PM, "Richard Brown" <richard at go2rba.com> wrote: > If your intent is to go to DVD, avoiding rendering audio is a big plus. > If your camera can > record in 16 bit 48KHz, keep this depth all the way through your > project. Digital > re-rendering from low to high is the sort of thing that makes audio > engineers > cringe. Even the state of the art in "up-rezzing" creates digital sonic > impurities, > which, while often negligible, in bad cases is atrocious. We never have > any > troubles here even with a bunch of 48KHz tracks, either on a TiBook, or > on our > desktop editors. Were it only that music libraries thought in 48KHz. > > Richard Brown