Kunga-- It wasn't attributable until you you attributed it. :-) If your original quote had said something like "ThinkSecret reported that..." or "A reputable news site reported that...", I probably wouldn't have responded. When I know something about the source, I know how much credibility to assign to the information. The reliability of "unnamed sources" can be kinda spotty. I always take such information with a grain of salt. As an example, here is the last paragraph from the ThinkSecret archive for January 3, reporting about the upcoming expo: >Laptops and Power Macs will also not get a makeover, sources >confirm. Most speculation was that iBooks and PowerBooks would not >see upgrades, as they were just upgraded this past November. >However, Apple is expected to update the Power Mac line, like the >iMacs, in late January or early February. That contains a mix of incorrect and correct information coming from unnamed sources. I never take that sort of thing as gospel. <http://www.thinksecret.com/news/mwsf03cpus.html> Your iLife pricing information may, in fact, be correct. But I wouldn't state it without some qualification. But thanks for alerting me to the ThinkSecret site. It looks like a handy source of information and speculation, and I've added it to my list of Mac news sites to check frequently. --Gordon On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 22:21:52 -0800, Thubten Kunga <Kunga at FutureMedia.org> wrote: >You think this isn't attributable evidence? Looks solid to me. You want >Think Secret to reveal their sources? That's like saying the Watergate >break-in wasn't created at the White House because The Washington Post >never revealed theirs. I respect news bureaus right not to reveal their >sources and I still believe them. I think Nick dePlume, the Publisher >and Editor In Chief of Think Secret, is a stand-up guy. Are you so >cynical that you have to hear Steve confess before you will believe the >TS account? > >http://www.thinksecret.com/news/freeiapps.html > >k > >On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 10:10 PM, Gordon B. Alley wrote: > >> I've seen plenty of references, in this list and elsewhere, stating >> that Apple had planned to charge for all the iLife apps, and then was >> forced to back down at the last minute because of the negative >> reaction. But I've yet to see any attributable evidence that this was, >> in fact, the case. >> >> There were a lot of rumors floating around before the MacWorld Expo, >> and most of them turned out to be wrong. A Merrill Lynch analyst even >> downgraded his rating for Apple before the expo because Apple > > supposedly didn't have any significant new products in its pipeline. > > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 19:10:41 -0800, Thubten Kunga > >> > >> Steve made the decision unilaterally just days before the keynote > >> because of all the griping and then gave everybody who was in the > >> house > >> at the keynote a FREE copy of $99 KEYNOTE to insure no booing. ; ^ ) [...] -- Gordon Alley <*> <mailto:galley at texas.net> <http://galley.home.texas.net>