On Nov 17, 2006, at 2:06 AM, Geoffrey Loeffler wrote: > > On Oct 28, 2006, at 8:31 PM, Nick Scalise wrote: > >> On Oct 28, 2006, at 8:47 PM, nk wrote: >> >>> I am planning to stay put with respect to my Mac hardware, >>> software and OS. >> >> Do you mean like the folks that are still on OS 9? > > OS 9 is now 7 year old and still runs everything just fine, except > the web browser maybe getting unusable due to lack of upgrades. But > unless your high end graphics, video, movie or music editor. That > is probably 90% of the average computer user who do email, surfing > and keeping photos. How much power do you really need. These > machines already are way over powered then the average user needs, > the software companies just keep building bloatware to take more > space and to take more e RAM but what can you really do that you > can't on 9 or could have done if Apple kept support for a browser. > > Al products are built to become self obsolete, so you and all the > others just keep buying blazing speed, more powerful. I wrote a > legal brief on a Mac 512 in MacWrite, how could I possibly have > done it any faster on the most powerful computer today. I can only > type so fast. That was system 6 and it worked just fine. I have a > G3 6100 run 24/7 does everything my Pismo's do, which does > everything my 1.2 Ghz iBooks do, which does everything my 1.67Ghz > G4 PB does. * I have a 1956 K & E slide rule and it does everything that I need. Who needs more than three significant figures anyway? earle *