At 1:54 PM -0600 1/4/03, Eric B. Richardson wrote: > >What I objected to has to do with the term 'chicken hawk' which is >long term standing slang for a pedophile that is decades old at >least. The people who appropriated this term for this debate are >aware of that meaning, and by doing so, implicating our national >leaders with such connotations, is shameful and reprehensible >behavior. I did not object to the criticism. If I did, it would be >along the lines like this: These are public figures we are referring to here--among the chickenhawks are George Bush, Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, John Ashcroft, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Spencer Abraham, Don Evans, Karl Rove, Andrew Card, Tom DeLay, Trent Lott, Bob Barr, Mitch McConnell, Dick Armey, Phil Gramm, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Newt Gingrich, Mark Racicot, Rudy Guliani, Charlton Heston, Wayne LaPierre, Bill Bennett, Jerry Falwell, George Will, Bill O'Reilly, Tony Snow, Britt Hume and Sean Hannity--and as such are subject to being called any name the public cares to put on them. I am not saying they are pedophiles, that is your construction. I am saying that insasmuch as they are promoting war, it serves us all to consider the roots of such advocacy. There are two kinds of people--those who served and those who did not. Among those who served, there are those who were put in a position to kill or be killed. And among these, there are the ones who survived and the ones who did not. Before we create any more of this last group, we should carefully consider ALL the options. Many of us believe the current impasse, as well as other problems afflicting our current body politic, are largely due to the Bush Administration's utter malfeasance in foreign affairs. People close to the current unelected administration who have survived combat have, to a man so far as I know, opposed the hair trigger, cowboy approach Bush advocates, going to war with or without provocation or international support. As has been autoritatitvely documented in the past several weeks, this administration has no policy apparatus as did every administration previous, instead making all policy decisions based on short term political considerations. Neither my children nor yours should die to advance a domestic political agenda. Just last week it was suggested by a London Guardian columnist that the better course to pursue would be to parachute English soldiers into swing states to hand out Bush Cheney brochuers, thus avoiding the "war" charade. They are not pedophiles, they are worse. They are craven cowards willing to sacrifice the blood and lives of your children and mine for the sake of political opportunism. George W. himself got into the National Guard because of who his daddy was and then, adding insult to injury, was awol his last year of obligation. You can yammer on as much as you like about this not being an unusual situation, but I urge you to check again. This is different and it is way wrong. John Paul Moore johnpaulmoore at austin.rr.com http://alllinked.com